<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t disable Vista UAC system-wide; disable Vista UAC per application</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/</link>
	<description>helping you abuse your system one day at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-13552</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 05:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-13552</guid>
		<description>This is an INCORRECT tip. What it does is it lies to applications that CAN RUN PROPERLY without UAC but require UAC for some reason to run without a UAC prompt by telling the app that it is running elevated. It does NOT actually run the app elevated. There is NO WAY to make only a certain app run elevated without prompt or it would breach the system&#039;s security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an INCORRECT tip. What it does is it lies to applications that CAN RUN PROPERLY without UAC but require UAC for some reason to run without a UAC prompt by telling the app that it is running elevated. It does NOT actually run the app elevated. There is NO WAY to make only a certain app run elevated without prompt or it would breach the system&#8217;s security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-9805</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 15:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-9805</guid>
		<description>Helped with an application issue with Windows Server 2008 R2 running Citrix XenApp 6.0.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helped with an application issue with Windows Server 2008 R2 running Citrix XenApp 6.0.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: must-have-Software f?r Win7 - Alternativprodukte? Verbesserungsvorschl?ge? - Seite 2 - TweakPC Hardware Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-7359</link>
		<dc:creator>must-have-Software f?r Win7 - Alternativprodukte? Verbesserungsvorschl?ge? - Seite 2 - TweakPC Hardware Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-7359</guid>
		<description>[...] Bei mir ist es xFire.    ich h?tte das vielleicht besser hinzugeschrieben, mein Fehler     systemsabuse.com - Don&#8217;t disable Vista UAC system-wide; disable Vista UAC per application  Sollte auch unter 7 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bei mir ist es xFire.    ich h?tte das vielleicht besser hinzugeschrieben, mein Fehler     systemsabuse.com &#8211; Don&#8217;t disable Vista UAC system-wide; disable Vista UAC per application  Sollte auch unter 7 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Program Permissions &#124; keyongtech</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>Program Permissions &#124; keyongtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>[...]     systemsabuse.com - Don’t disable Vista UAC system-wide; disable Vista UAC per application: http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/...r-application/  -- click the Ratings button. Voting helps the web interface. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]     systemsabuse.com &#8211; Don’t disable Vista UAC system-wide; disable Vista UAC per application: <a href="http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/...r-application/" rel="nofollow">http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/&#8230;r-application/</a>  &#8212; click the Ratings button. Voting helps the web interface. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Didn&#039;t work for me... :(

I have configured one of my Virtual Machines in VirtualBox to use a physical partition.  Problem is this requires admin privileges.  I tried your fix - didn&#039;t work.  I guess I have to find another solution.  Thanks anyway.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t work for me&#8230; <img src='http://www.systemsabuse.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I have configured one of my Virtual Machines in VirtualBox to use a physical partition.  Problem is this requires admin privileges.  I tried your fix &#8211; didn&#8217;t work.  I guess I have to find another solution.  Thanks anyway.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>This has been around for a while.  All those compatibility fixes that you keep downloading from Windows Update are nothing more than SDB files going into the master list.  If you use ACT you&#039;ll see thousands of applications that are already configured.  

It is unfair to say that MS should have thought about this before.  Even XP has had ACT.  They&#039;ve done such a good job of hiding it that you&#039;re just now starting to hear about it.  I can hardly see where hiding the gory details is in some way a failure.  If you don&#039;t want to wait for compatibility fix for your app then you can use ACT.  The wizard is actually pretty simple if you don&#039;t feel like getting technical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been around for a while.  All those compatibility fixes that you keep downloading from Windows Update are nothing more than SDB files going into the master list.  If you use ACT you&#8217;ll see thousands of applications that are already configured.  </p>
<p>It is unfair to say that MS should have thought about this before.  Even XP has had ACT.  They&#8217;ve done such a good job of hiding it that you&#8217;re just now starting to hear about it.  I can hardly see where hiding the gory details is in some way a failure.  If you don&#8217;t want to wait for compatibility fix for your app then you can use ACT.  The wizard is actually pretty simple if you don&#8217;t feel like getting technical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ridiculous</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>ridiculous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>See, it should have this sort of functionality written into it, you shouldn&#039;t have to mess around and manually disable UAC for EACH program. You can bet the average user isnt going to bother with this process for each individual program, and just continue to have UAC disabled (which will inevitably lead to doing something you wish you hadn&#039;t).

Yet another failure in foresight in microsoft&#039;s court. Vista really is shaping up to be the new Windows ME, and between Vista and the xbox360&#039;s slew of hardware problems, this year isnt shaping up to be one of microsoft&#039;s good ones.

However, nice article, and thanks for posting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, it should have this sort of functionality written into it, you shouldn&#8217;t have to mess around and manually disable UAC for EACH program. You can bet the average user isnt going to bother with this process for each individual program, and just continue to have UAC disabled (which will inevitably lead to doing something you wish you hadn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>Yet another failure in foresight in microsoft&#8217;s court. Vista really is shaping up to be the new Windows ME, and between Vista and the xbox360&#8242;s slew of hardware problems, this year isnt shaping up to be one of microsoft&#8217;s good ones.</p>
<p>However, nice article, and thanks for posting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Noël Anderruthy</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Noël Anderruthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I am sorry but it doesn&#039;t work !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry but it doesn&#8217;t work !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deshabilitar UAC &#171; Blog de Rodrigo Juarez</title>
		<link>http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Deshabilitar UAC &#171; Blog de Rodrigo Juarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemsabuse.com/2008/01/02/dont-disable-completely-vista-uac-disable-vista-uac-per-application/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] Don’t disable Vista UAC system-wide; disable Vista UAC per application [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don’t disable Vista UAC system-wide; disable Vista UAC per application [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

